Moldova Proxies

Use the same client, endpoint, protocol, browser state, and acceptance rule for both routes. Verify each observed exit independently and retain country labels on every row so results cannot be merged into an ambiguous regional total. Keep the MDA run manifest with client, protocol, network, selector, session rule, authorized endpoint, expected response, exit source, outcome code, and timestamps. Reconcile the manifest with all results before calculating a pass rate. Use only an endpoint permitted for the Moldova test, keep missing measurements explicit, and never rotate around a refusal or other mandatory stop.

Do not infer city, ZIP, coordinates, carrier, ASN, language, or resident identity from country success. If a narrower field matters, confirm that the chosen product supports it and validate that field in a separate test. The Europe list places Macedonia's 3,099 and Luxembourg's 2,910 nearest to the Moldova historical total. That placement helps audit the catalogue; it neither confirms current supply nor ranks buyer outcomes. Keep MDA comparator rows labelled and diagnose the requested Moldova route from its own evidence rather than a neighbouring count. Record why each comparator belongs in the authorized review before using it.

Compare offers on the same workload, sample size, valid-result rule, metering basis, and minimum commitment. Reject a headline unit price that depends on hiding failed observations or assuming the historical pool is live inventory. Before purchasing Moldova, make the MDA threshold reproducible: state product, country precision, protocol, session mode, representative workload, valid-result rule, retries, evidence, and retest trigger. Include every planned outcome when applying it. Reject any Moldova conclusion built from an unverified exit, hidden failures, or a changed rule, and repeat MDA verification after a material configuration change.