Maldives Proxies

Use the same endpoint, timeout, and acceptance rule for the pilot. Preserve raw status and a safe evidence marker beside the assigned class, and review ambiguous cases without relabeling them merely to improve the reported result. The MDV result table should expose the denominator: planned attempts, valid responses, explicit failures, unresolved rows, and retries. Attach route and client configuration, exit evidence, response class, and time to each row so the calculation can be repeated. Use only an endpoint permitted for the Maldives test, keep missing measurements explicit, and never rotate around a refusal or other mandatory stop.

Do not infer city, ZIP, coordinates, carrier, ASN, language, or resident identity from country success. If a narrower field matters, confirm that the chosen product supports it and validate that field in a separate test. The Asia list places Uzbekistan's 14,197 and Georgia's 13,054 nearest to the Maldives historical total. That placement helps audit the catalogue; it neither confirms current supply nor ranks buyer outcomes. Keep MDV comparator rows labelled and diagnose the requested Maldives route from its own evidence rather than a neighbouring count. Record why each comparator belongs in the authorized review before using it.

Approve a larger purchase only when the paired result repeats under the same written procedure. A one-off success, an unverified exit, or a result that changes with browser state does not establish a dependable country route. MDV purchase review should name the product, required country precision, protocol, session rule, sample size, accepted-result definition, retry ceiling, and retained proof. Verify support and count every scheduled Maldives observation before accepting the offer. Reject any Maldives conclusion built from an unverified exit, hidden failures, or a changed rule, and repeat MDV verification after a material configuration change.